The opinions expressed are personal and represent the person, not Freedom News. We allow all opinions to be expressed, even if they are uncomfortable. We stand for real freedom of expression.
The Sweden Democrats’ evolution since entering the Riksdag in 2010 is being examined following the election. The discussion covers the party’s political shifts, the election campaign, Jimmie Åkesson, the party’s future, and criticism of how the Sweden Democrats have evolved over the years. The role of the media, the future of small parties, and what will be required over the next four years are also addressed.
Here's where you'll find Petra's YouTube channel.
Petra was allowed to dig—but not very deep—when she worked at Swebbtv.
Draft declaration:
Swebbtv was probably afraid of being punished by the authorities if they allowed their employee Petra to dig deeper.
As we have seen, those in power have many tools at their disposal. For example, the suspension of Swish accounts.
However, the wise and courageous Petra continues to ”operate” behind the scenes, now on her own channel. Apparently, that’s acceptable—for now.
Yeah, Nisse, Petra is my favorite in the alternative media.
Most likely, that is exactly the case.
As usual, Petra is right in what she says about the Sweden Democrats—that they were even planning to win the hearts of the people, and then secretly betrayed them on one issue after another, only to end up just like all the other parties. Sad but true!!!
"Now Democracy" was a
There was another party that also went to hell, but they didn't let their voters down
I stopped voting for the Sweden Democrats in 2018, because by then they had already let me down enough that I couldn't keep voting for them, so I voted for Kasselstrand instead
Petra is completely wrong when she says that SD was a setup from the start. Jerker, Leffe, Sven, Anders, Ola, and later Madde and others were genuine in their commitment. End of discussion on that matter.
But otherwise, Petra 100% is spot-on, and with her knowledge of everything from election results to so-called ”independent journalists,” she demonstrates why she is such a valuable asset to the serious, free press movement.
If it were possible to ”have one’s cake and eat it too,” it might have been the case that the SD’s founders—those who drove the party’s rise—were NOT corrupt. But alongside their otherwise honorable work, there may have been a watchful eye and a powerful hand that, behind the scenes, began planning a course of action for the benefit of a self-defined master race at the expense of Sweden and the best interests of our indigenous people.
"That sounds more plausible," I agree.
THE SWEDISH DEMOCRATS & LUNCH BUFFET: JIMMIE and his BROAD BODY TYPE.
To be perfectly honest, Lunch Buffet Jimmie is starting to look more and more like a HIPPOPOTAMUS. His blood pressure must be at an all-time high right now. :-(
Jimmie, head to the gym and hop on the nearest CROSSSTRAINER.
CROSSTRAINER. :-D
Alternative proposal:
Jimmie, go to Israel and put yourself in the front lines as cannon fodder for the continued expansion of the self-proclaimed “chosen master race” at the expense of other peoples.
Agreed!
Spot-on analysis by Petra! As brilliant as ever! Thanks!
Agreed!
Agree
Listen to what Petra actually says! It’s hard not to be impressed. She elegantly navigates between conspiracy theories and hypotheses, guided at all times by common sense and a life-affirming outlook.
Thank you so much, Petra! You're amazing!
I absolutely do not believe that either Leif Zeilon or Anders Klarström belong to any secret satanic society. However, there is strong evidence to suggest that Jimmie and the others in the liberal faction that took over the party in 2005 received substantial assistance from the Zionist-globalist powers that had already taken over the then-larger Danish People’s Party with counter-jihadism and ”they must be assimilated” slogans. Anyone who, then as now, parrots the obvious lie about what the 9/11 2001 psyop was is in the pocket of those powers, because no one can be so stupid as to buy into (((the narrative))).
That sounds very likely.
👍🏻