Bodström (S) Reveals: The Social Democrats and the Moderates Are So Similar That They Could Govern Together

To voters, the Social Democrats and the Moderates appear to be bitter rivals. But behind the political power struggle, there are significant similarities, according to former Social Democratic Minister Thomas Bodström. He is now proposing that the parties form a government together—and share the position of prime minister.

The former Social Democratic Minister of Justice Thomas Bodström in practice, calls into question the traditional division into political blocs in Swedish politics. In an interview with The Express He proposes that the Social Democrats (S) and the Moderates (M) form a coalition government.

Behind the Power Struggle—A Political Circus

Despite years of both parties emphasizing their differences, Bodström believes that Sweden’s two largest parties have enough in common to govern the country together. He argues that they share a common view on political stability and that this outweighs the heightened rhetoric during election campaigns.

– These are the major political parties that believe in stability.

Bodström is likely hoping that the Social Democrats will be given a chance to take power now that their planned red-green coalition is falling apart. What he says, however, reveals much more about Swedish politics: the differences between the parties—especially the two largest in the Riksdag—are, in practice, merely a facade. In reality, the same policies and the same fundamental views prevail, regardless of who is in power.

The position of prime minister can be shared

Magdalena Andersson and Ulf Kristersson in a previous party leader debate on SVT. Screenshot: SVT
Magdalena Andersson and Ulf Kristersson in a previous party leader debate on SVT. Is the heated tone just a political circus? Screenshot: SVT

Bodström goes beyond simply proposing a collaboration. He wants to Magdalena Andersson (S) and Ulf Kristersson (M) shares the position of prime minister and leads the country for two years at a time. However, M and S do not have a majority on their own, as S received 28.01 percent and M received 19.85 percent, for a combined total of 47.86 percent. To ensure they secure more than 50 percent, they will each need to bring a small party on board, according to Bodström.

– They can each serve two years, with their own party.

He also compares the relationship between the Social Democrats and the Moderates to the rivalry between two soccer clubs. According to Bodström, opposition to the collaboration may be greater among the parties’ supporters than among the politicians themselves.

– It's as if AIK and Djurgården were to merge. The players would be able to handle it, but the fans might not.

Conflict Among Voters—Cooperation Among Politicians?

What is remarkable about Bodström’s proposal is not that he suggests a power-sharing arrangement between the Moderates and the Social Democrats, but that he reveals there is no genuine difference between the parties. This has long been pointed out by critics of the system, who argue that neither party is interested in changing Sweden for the better, but rather in securing their well-paid positions in the Riksdag and in any future governments.

At the same time, Bodström believes that the Social Democrats could lose in a snap election. He therefore believes that the government crisis offers a rare opportunity to test cooperation between the two largest parties.

– I think this is the best opportunity in decades to try an S-M coalition government.

Support FrihetsNytt – our readers finance our journalism
Help us expose abuse of power – every gift means more journalism. Make a quick gift with a click below.
Payment is securely processed via Stripe. Card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay are supported.
CATEGORIES

Comment section

Comments are not pre-moderated by Frihetsnytt and are not editorial content. You are legally responsible for what you write in the comment section.

7 COMMENTS

  1. Bodström is absolutely right!
    The fact is that there are only minor differences in detail between the parties in the Riksdag. These differences come down to commas in tax rates or minor, irrelevant proposals that the parties initially bicker over.
    But overall, everyone in the 100% group of eight agrees on the general direction.

    All the ”fighting” between them is just a game for us here in the masses.

  2. They have one thing in common—they are both terrible traitorous parties with equally terrible politicians. Today, Ulf—the gender-swapper—is in Denmark, showering Ukraine with billions more. Just like the obedient lapdog to Wallenberg and the American arms industry that he is. Tvi. Andersson attends Bilderberg meetings. Traitors to the people

  3. He's absolutely right—the Moderates and the Social Democrats are exactly the same kind of scum; they're only after power and don't give a damn about the people; it's so obvious. But it might actually be a good thing if they did that—then new parties would probably be elected to our parliament, and the current parties would lose a lot of voter support.

LEAVE A COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE

Do you want to take the next step and become a part of Frihetsnytt?

We at Frihetsnytt are entirely dependent on our readers' support. The most important support comes from our members. Are you interested in taking the next step, enjoying exclusive benefits, and becoming a part of the freedom struggle? - Then you should become a member of Frihetsnytt! Read more and subscribe membership here. 

Latest news

- Advertisement -

become a subscriber

Similar articles