The opinions expressed are personal and represent the person, not Freedom News. We allow all opinions to be expressed, even if they are uncomfortable. We stand for real freedom of expression.
FILM: ”The party leaders” debate was the first step for us to reach out”
Support FrihetsNytt – our readers finance our journalism
Help us expose abuse of power – every gift means more journalism. Make a quick gift with a click below.
Payment is securely processed via Stripe. Card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay are supported.
Comment section
Comments are not pre-moderated by Frihetsnytt and are not editorial content. You are legally responsible for what you write in the comment section.
7 COMMENTS
LEAVE A COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE
Do you want to take the next step and become a part of Frihetsnytt?
We at Frihetsnytt are entirely dependent on our readers' support. The most important support comes from our members. Are you interested in taking the next step, enjoying exclusive benefits, and becoming a part of the freedom struggle? - Then you should become a member of Frihetsnytt! Read more and subscribe membership here.
It is important that the Nordic Resistance Movement does not
I think they were invited, too.
I believe that a large portion of the Swedish public has wanted to see clearer and more diverse positions expressed by the most interesting parties outside the Riksdag.
You're absolutely right, Jonas; the NMR should have been invited.
I hope they invite them to the next debate!!
And the Örebro Party should have been there, too!!!
Where else would you find such an exciting debate (apart from that laughing madman from the Ministry of Defense who never got to the point)? You never get to see a debate this straightforward and well-conducted on SVT.
I completely agree, Lars. The guy from MOD was a bit stubborn, though—he did make some valid points amid all the rambling, but he doesn't focus on the most important issues.
It was more like he was giving a lecture.
The Örebro Party was certainly asked, but as I understand it, they chose to decline.
They have some good points, but they’re populist and ”pick low-hanging fruit”—a strategy that a large portion of the public can agree is quite effective.However, they haven’t really made it clear where they stand on the ”Sweden for the Swedes” issue and whether or not they are a nationalist alternative.
They probably have nothing to gain from a debate with AFS or NMR.
Kasselstrand is the only one who views immigration from an ethnic perspective. The others think the invasion is totally fine ”as long as they work and behave themselves.” They don’t care that we, as a people, will soon be in the minority. If you’re a true nationalist, there are only two options: AfS and NMR.
I completely agree with that.
I wonder why that is. Those of us who follow Rils or have been involved with the SD probably think that this kind of nationalism—I wouldn’t even call it that—is self-evident. Yet there’s only one party—AfS—that is ideologically nationalist and explicitly states that it takes an ethnic perspective on the immigration issue. I think this shows just how stigmatized nationalism and the immigration issue have become. Either we need to raise awareness—I see that AfS is doing well—or the other parties are too afraid to take such a step. I see NMR as a party that doesn’t focus as clearly on the immigration issue as AfS does, which is both a strength and a weakness. However, I’m not very familiar with them.
Go to Motståndsrörelsen.se. It's a great website where you can find answers to all your questions.