The opinions expressed are personal and represent the person, not Freedom News. We allow all opinions to be expressed, even if they are uncomfortable. We stand for real freedom of expression.
FILM: 5 Major Differences Between the Parties – Could the Right Split?
Support FrihetsNytt – our readers finance our journalism
Help us expose abuse of power – every gift means more journalism. Make a quick gift with a click below.
Payment is securely processed via Stripe. Card, Apple Pay, and Google Pay are supported.
Comment section
Comments are not pre-moderated by Frihetsnytt and are not editorial content. You are legally responsible for what you write in the comment section.
4 COMMENTS
LEAVE A COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE
Do you want to take the next step and become a part of Frihetsnytt?
We at Frihetsnytt are entirely dependent on our readers' support. The most important support comes from our members. Are you interested in taking the next step, enjoying exclusive benefits, and becoming a part of the freedom struggle? - Then you should become a member of Frihetsnytt! Read more and subscribe membership here.
Very well said, Tor-Björn.
The Sweden Democrats” pro-Israel stance is a ploy to avoid the endless bickering about ”Nazis”
and it worked…
It cannot be ruled out that such motives may have been present. Nevertheless, it is practical politics that should be the primary consideration. And in the case of the Zionist Democrats, this has unfortunately entailed betrayal and treachery on ALL ISSUES OF VITAL IMPORTANCE TO THE SWEDISH PEOPLE.
The SD is a terrorist-supporting, treasonous party that should be immediately deported to Israel.
All the good people who support the SD need to open their hearts and use their brains to conduct a simple, quick analysis of what the party has done. This applies to the EU, NATO, the DCA agreement, and continued mass immigration and the resulting population replacement. In addition, it concerns the betrayal of science regarding the vaccinations and the acceptance of the state’s abuses against the population, including fraud and the expansion of the state’s tools of repression.
If there were a contest to see who could say the most wise things in a given amount of time, this highly topical film would certainly be a top contender. Thanks, Frihetsnytt, Tor-Björn, and Tobbe!
To comment in writing on everything covered in the film would probably require an entire book, but here are a few reflections on the subject.
Tor-Björn points out that nationalism is a natural phenomenon. While I agree, there is reason to take this line of thinking a step further. All world religions and established political ideologies were created by people who were unaware of or did not understand what we now know about scientific findings in biology, the origin of species, and the evolution and conditions of life.
A deeper understanding of sacred evolution also leads to a spiritual realization of life’s vulnerability and wondrous splendor. By (at least in broad terms) understand the mechanisms of evolution, we realize that our unique species, Homo sapiens, is likely the first to have shifted from being primarily driven by instinct to being driven by intellectual understanding—which opens the door to the only truly spiritual moral philosophy that has ever existed: kinship ethics.
Kin morality is based on the simple rule: ”favor those who are closely related and equal.” It is embedded in everything from the simplest organisms all the way up to us humans. However, we still have not freed ourselves from hateful doctrines such as Christianity and communism, with their life-denying platitudes about ”loving your neighbor as yourself” (which, according to the sect leader, moreover referred only to other Jews, not to the rest of humanity) or ”to each according to his needs”.
It’s easy to be generous with other people’s (tax) money and easy to want everything for everyone without limits. The only problem is that reality has its limits, which is why life is all about priorities. Exactly how these priorities should be set is difficult to determine, and it’s typically inappropriate to generalize about it, but the basic principle—to favor those who are equally related—appears to be a sacred, eternal truth.
Apart from the fact that nationalism is not ”a doctrine” in the usual sense but perhaps rather a fundamental worldview, nationalism is the only worldview that measures up now that we are entering a new era that began in 1859, when the sacred doctrine of evolution first achieved its public breakthrough through Darwin’s *On the Origin of Species*.
True nationalism, as defined by many nationalists, strives for diversity and meritocracy through freedom of speech and a love of life—including all manifestations of life, but especially a love for one’s own people, who consist of ancestors, those living today, and future generations; of one’s own ethnic people.
Various figures in politics and the media were discussed, and there is certainly much to question regarding the motives behind their positions, as well as the refusal of some to address certain issues. Perhaps this issue highlights the absurd situation in which the Western world finds itself today, where the findings of true science are often dismissed as conspiracy theories, while at the same time we imprison historians who investigate an alleged event during World War II.
The conclusion is that we need to liberate science, establish freedom of speech, and prohibit monopoly-like situations in which a disproportionately large share of the media is controlled by a specific minority that is allowed to act on the basis of a self-defined sense of superiority over everyone else.
As the discussion touched on, Zionism, Israel, and Judaism likely constitute a kind of dividing line that most intelligent people probably sense, more or less consciously. If one crosses this line, there is a striking risk of missing out on opportunities for success, regardless of the field in question. This makes it all the more impressive that the well-read Gustav Kasselstrand both dares and is willing to address the issue. If only for this reason, he deserves every bit of support. The fact that AfS also holds a number of wise and well-founded views makes the matter even better and the choice quite obvious.